* Dave Zarzycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 19:23] wrote: > Attached and tested. > > I'd like to merge this in unless anybody objects. I don't object, I'm just wondering if you know could discuss the implementation here versus the other ones avaiable at: http://www.psc.edu/networking/all_sack.html About the strength/weaknesses of those methods versus this one. The one developed at PSC looks like the most advanced one. Is this work derived from any of those? -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
- Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current Mike Silbersack
- Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current Dave Zarzycki
- Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current Julian Elischer
- Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current Alfred Perlstein
- Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current Dave Zarzycki
- Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current Julian Elischer
- Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current Mike Silbersack
- Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current singh
- Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current Mike Silbersack
- Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current Mike Silbersack
- Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current Jeffrey Hsu
- Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current Mike Silbersack
- Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current Harkirat Singh
- Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current Mike Silbersack
