Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current

[Mike Silbersack]

On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Jeffrey Hsu wrote:

> Rate-halving is implemented in the PSC version of SACK.  Perhaps
> we should take a look at that?

Makes sense, if we want Rate-halving.  All the papers evaluating it have
sounded good, and it probably is good to incorporate.  My only concern is
whether it will be controversial to merge, which is why I think I'd like
basic SACK + newreno first, then Rate-halving + FACK later.

Of course, that does emply that taking the SACK bits from the PSC
implementation might be best then.  I'll look more into this.

Mike "Silby" Silbersack


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message