On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 07:53:20PM -0400, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 07:32:18PM -0400, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> > > > >sys/net/if.c and bpf.c have problems with if_detach() and
> > > > >bpfdetach() when they are called with a struct ifnet that has not had
> > > > >if_attach() and bpfattach() called on it.  Null pointer reference ->
> > > > >*boom* etc.
> > > > 
> > > > I would say that this is to be expected.  Why is the system calling
> > > > the detach functions on a device that isn't attached in the first
> > > > place?
> > > 
> > > Driver mistake, but I see no reason why these functions shouldn't handle
> > > this gracefully.
> > 
> > Because all it does is conceal the original error.  Better to catch
> > the mistake and fix the driver than paper it over.
> 
> Right; rather than failing the detach routines will fuss about it so you
> know exactly how you screwed up.  I don't see this papering anything over.

Because this is not a normal operational error.  If anything, the
statement should be a KASSERT(), but I don't really see the need for it.
-- 
Jonathan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Reply via email to