On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> > Right; rather than failing the detach routines will fuss about it so you
> > know exactly how you screwed up. I don't see this papering anything over.
>
> Because this is not a normal operational error. If anything, the
> statement should be a KASSERT(), but I don't really see the need for it.
bpfdetach() already has a test for this case; adding one to
if_detach() doesn't seem like a bad thing so long as abusing if_index
isn't a problem.
--
| Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax |
| http://www.jurai.net/~winter | For Great Justice! | ISO8802.5 4ever |
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
