Hi,
Having multiple routing tables is a very nice and (was a) long awaited
capability in FreeBSD. Having it since years is even more cool, because
we can assume it's stable now.
But not having infrastructure support for it sucks, this makes people
hacking with rc.local or various scripts in various places.
There is a(t least one) PR about it: conf/145440, which proposes a
standard method for setting up different FIBs in a seems to be logical
way, which is compatible with the current single routing table method of
static_routes.
Are there any objections about this PR? Is there something we can do to
get it committed?
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
