Здравствуйте
On 01/20/12 08:15, Коньков Евгений wrote:
Здравствуйте, Attila.
Вы писали 20 января 2012 г., 8:52:47:
AN> Hi,
AN> Having multiple routing tables is a very nice and (was a) long awaited
AN> capability in FreeBSD. Having it since years is even more cool, because
AN> we can assume it's stable now.
AN> But not having infrastructure support for it sucks, this makes people
AN> hacking with rc.local or various scripts in various places.
AN> There is a(t least one) PR about it: conf/145440, which proposes a
AN> standard method for setting up different FIBs in a seems to be logical
AN> way, which is compatible with the current single routing table method of
AN> static_routes.
AN> Are there any objections about this PR? Is there something we can do to
AN> get it committed?
I have a patch
http://kes.net.ua/softdev/fib_patch.html
That tries to solve a different (the next one if you like) problem, and
there is(are?) a PR for that too, with a similar approach.
The above PR is about creating static routes for different FIBs, which
is the first step.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
