25.02.2012 02:00, Andrew Thompson пишет: > 2012/2/25 Eugene Grosbein <[email protected]>: >> 25.02.2012 00:14, Eugene Grosbein пишет: >>> This problem occurs only when net.isr.direct=0/net.isr.direct_force=0. >>> And only when lagg1 has both ports up and running. And when I use oversized >>> pings. >>> At the same time, transit oversized pings go through this BRAS just fine, >>> no packet loss at all. >> >> Running two copies of tcpdump for igb0 and igb1 simultaneously, >> I see that fragments of the same ICMP echo-reply packet encapsulated within >> PPPoE >> frame always go out through different ports of lagg1. Even when they arrive >> to client in order, >> it seems this depends of switching network in between PPPoE server and >> client. >> > > If you are running a recent HEAD then you can try setting > net.link.lagg.0.use_flowid to zero.
It helps to set net.link.lagg.1.use_flowid=1, yes (but I use 8.2-STABLE with this sysctl added). Perhaps, ip_fragment() does not keep flowid for fragments it creates. Eugene Grosbein _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
