> On Sep 14, 2025, at 12:29, Karl Denninger <k...@denninger.net> wrote:
> Rolling this around in my head some more..... what is the underlying 
> interface?
> I ask because I saw this happen with "re" driver interfaces (both IPv4 and 6) 
> where it would not get an ARP map and thus couldn't see anything at all on 
> the outside - there were enough other screwball things going on with the "re" 
> driver (timeouts and similar) that I tossed that and now run on ix and a 
> couple of SFP+ transceivers which has been entirely-stable (although igb also 
> appears to work as I've gotten my hands on a box with a couple of those and 
> tested that too.)


In my case it’s an ix.  Connected to a 1gbps switch interface, but an ix 
interface.  And, the same hardware that was doing this fine a few months ago.

vlan0: flags=1008843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 
mtu 1500
        
options=4600703<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6,MEXTPG>
        ether a4:53:0e:79:b9:82
        inet A.B.C.D netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast A.B.C.255
        inet6 fe80::6e8:e675:f359:3465%vlan0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
        groups: vlan
        vlan: 6 vlanproto: 802.1q vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: ix0
        media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
        status: active
        nd6 options=1<PERFORMNUD>

ix0: flags=1008843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 
mtu 1500
        
options=4e53fbb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,WOL_UCAST,WOL_MCAST,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6,HWSTATS,MEXTPG>
        ether a4:53:0e:79:b9:82
        media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
        status: active
        nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>


> Given that arp issue I have to wonder if both are connected -- incidentally 
> when I was testing that unit I also tried the "native" split IPv4/IPv6 
> requester for dhcp rather than dhcpcd and had the same results, so I tend to 
> think dhcpcd is probably not the cause.

Yup.  I agree.  There’s something off at a lower level, I’m just like “But I 
didn’t change anything!!!”  At least, that’s what my head keeps telling me.  :-)

- Chris



Reply via email to