On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I recall that there were significant issues with jemalloc on > computational loads, primarily because of the alignment jemalloc ends > up giving to various allocation sizes and the cache-busting behaviour > of that. > > Does anyone remember the thread in which that happened? Maybe someone > posted a patch that lets people quickly tweak jemalloc to try and > avoid this? > I think you mean this one: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2013-January/041624.html _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
