Yup, that one. I wonder if that has anything to do here..
Adrian On 23 March 2013 17:20, Adam Vande More <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I recall that there were significant issues with jemalloc on >> computational loads, primarily because of the alignment jemalloc ends >> up giving to various allocation sizes and the cache-busting behaviour >> of that. >> >> Does anyone remember the thread in which that happened? Maybe someone >> posted a patch that lets people quickly tweak jemalloc to try and >> avoid this? > > > I think you mean this one: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2013-January/041624.html > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
