hi jon,
Multiple tables in rules are tricky because they are not treated as "sets" that can be arbitrarily compared (ie, IPs in table A that are not in table B).
well a big aha!+grumble on my part ... thanks! for the clarification. i did NOT understand that correctly :-( so, *IS* there a way to accomplish that? namely, match against a boolean-composite of tables? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
