On 4/27/07, snowcrash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Multiple tables in rules are tricky because they are not treated as > "sets" that can be arbitrarily compared (ie, IPs in table A that are > not in table B).
so, *IS* there a way to accomplish that? namely, match against a boolean-composite of tables?
On OpenBSD, I use spamd-setup which does exactly that with the whitelist/blacklist tables. One could probably hack up a cron-able sed/awk/perl thingy to read from 2 tables, mash up the contents however you wish, and fill a 3rd table with the result. -- Jon _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
