On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 12:25:01AM +0300, Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: > On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 01:04:05 +0400 > "Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > [Wow, man, dspam ports is sure a place to learn many > > things :-) Great job!] > > Thanks. > I'm pretty sure I re-invented the wheel a few times there; but overall > I consider it to be one of the most user-friendly ports we have. > > We could _optionally_ support that kind of UPDATING file in our > framework; and we also could support the check-options-version.
Automatically displaying some part of files/UPDATING to the user is
great. It would just be little more easier to manage if it would display
up to the next entry (e.g. stop when line ^## is found) rather than a
predefined number of lines. Thus eliminating the need to support the
_UPD_LINE_NO variable.
--
Vasil Dimov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
%
Testing can show the presense of bugs, but not their absence.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra
pgpuOwDhDWPo9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
