Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote:
> The problem with the OP's work is that some submitters/commiters think
> that the CVS commit message should document the _port_ changes while
> others think it should also document (or at least provide pointers) to
> the changes in the software itself
Good commit messages should do both.
On the other hand, there is no substitute for the user/admin thinking
for themselves. I think that if we try to overengineer making things
foolproof, the universe will simply conspire to create "better" fools.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
