Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500: > I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more > in > bsd.gnome.mk and it seems to me that the suggested patch is really > equivalent to the patch enclosed here. > > Why did the writer of bsd.gnome.mk have the rather complicated > construction which I am proposing to replace?
I don't know, we'd have to ask Joe Marcus. Here is the revision in question: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk.diff?r1=1.22;r2=1.23 You're basically reverting that revision. Perhaps our make(1) wasn't smart enough those four years ago, I don't know. > Prostý textový dokument příloha (eee) > --- bsd.gnome.mk-orig Mon Mar 19 23:13:36 2007 > +++ bsd.gnome.mk Wed May 23 19:25:19 2007 > @@ -689,9 +689,9 @@ > > # Then traverse through all components, check which of them > # exist in ${_USE_GNOME} and set variables accordingly > +.ifdef _USE_GNOME > . for component in ${_USE_GNOME_ALL} > -_COMP_TEST= ${_USE_GNOME:M${component}} > -. if ${_COMP_TEST:S/${component}//}!=${_COMP_TEST:S/ / /g} > +. if ${_USE_GNOME:M${component}}!="" > PATCH_DEPENDS+= ${${component}_PATCH_DEPENDS} > FETCH_DEPENDS+= ${${component}_FETCH_DEPENDS} > EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=${${component}_EXTRACT_DEPENDS} > @@ -725,6 +725,7 @@ > > . endif > . endfor > +.endif > .endif > > .if defined(GNOME_PRE_PATCH) -- Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The Linimon's Rule: The More You Close, The More Will Come
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
