Andrew Pantyukhin píše v út 11. 09. 2007 v 02:00 +0400: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:58:34PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > Dmitry Marakasov píše v po 10. 09. 2007 v 19:26 +0400: > > > * Pav Lucistnik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > > > > > It's possible to use this feature, but only on -CURRENT and -STABLE > > > > > > FreeBSD systems newer than certain date. No existing release > > > > > > supports it > > > > > > - it will be supported in upcoming 6.3 and 7.0. > > > > > Erm, isn't ports code (more or less) release-independent? What's > > > > > missing > > > > > in existing FreeBSD versions that's needed to support options.mk? > > > > The make only looks into /usr/share/mk for includes, until told > > > > otherwise. bsd.port.options.mk is included before bsd.port.pre.mk, so it > > > > can't be found. Base system was modified to install stub of the same > > > > name into /usr/share/mk to workaround this problem. > > > Understood. Then we really have to wait till 5.5 and 6.2 EOL to use > > > options.mk... That's a bit strange to wait multiple years for an > > > useful feature, aren't there any workaround planned? > > > > The question is, are there any workarounds possible? > > So am I missing something or is it as trivial as using these four > lines instead of one: > > USEOPTIONSMK= yes > INOPTIONSMK= yes > .include "bsd.port.mk" > .undef INOPTIONSMK
No idea, does it work? My only problem with that is it looks rather
scary :)
--
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It whines, glows and fades...
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
