Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:28:45 +0100 Kris Kennaway wrote:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 02:16 +0300:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
be wrapped.
Hm, ports-mgmt/tinderbox masks it somehow... And doesn't get
an error for this port.
The FreeBSD version inside the tinderbox is same as the host?
OK, I found the difference. The port builds for all FreeBSD version
except 5.x. The same is for ports-mgmt/tinderbox. Thus I think that
there is something that was not MFS'd to 5-STABLE that causes the
difference.
For now I'm going to mark the port as IGNORE for OSVERSION < 600000.
A question to portmgr@: Do you have any objections?
It would be nice to know what exactly is going on in there.
Yeah, I can't imagine what it would be, unless it is using uname(1) or
(3) and 5.x doesn't have the environment variable overrides...but in
that case hundreds of other things would break.
The port is using "uname -r" at the Makefile:
-----
OSRELEASE!= /usr/bin/uname -r
-----
WBR
Yes, but that alone should be fine unless the above.
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
