On 02/02/2012 10:22, Alberto Villa wrote: > On Thursday 02 February 2012 09:02:03 Matthew Seaman wrote: >> That seems to work pretty well, but the portmaster feature for deleting >> build-only dependencies doesn't seem to be doing anything. I'll need to >> rerun the tests to confirm that though. > > It has worked fine for me so far...
I think I see what the problem here is:
===>>> Deleting installed build-only dependencies
The following packages will be deinstalled:
pkg-1.0.b1
The deinstallation will require 0 B more space
Deinstalling pkg-1.0.b1... done
/usr/local/sbin/portmaster: /usr/local/sbin/pkg: not found
/usr/local/sbin/portmaster: /usr/local/sbin/pkg: not found
/usr/local/sbin/portmaster: /usr/local/sbin/pkg: not found
/usr/local/sbin/portmaster: /usr/local/sbin/pkg: not found
/usr/local/sbin/portmaster: /usr/local/sbin/pkg: not found
/usr/local/sbin/portmaster: /usr/local/sbin/pkg: not found
/usr/local/sbin/portmaster: /usr/local/sbin/pkg: not found
Ooops.
Also that deinstall list should have several more packages on it, not
just pkg-1.0.b1.
Hmmm... does this have to do with fix in revision 1.705 of bsd.port.mk?
Let me try yet again with that update in place.
Actually, here's a feature request for pkgng -- can we have:
pkg lock pkgname...
and
pkg unlock pkgname...
where pkgng will refuse to modify or delete a locked package? I see
this as mostly bullet-proof-shoes to be applied as required by system
administrators, but automatically locking pkgng on install makes sense
to me.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
