On 10 Apr 2012 04:50, "Cy Schubert" <[email protected]> wrote: > > In message <[email protected]>, Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > Hi, > > > > Apparently we are still sheaping php4 and his friends, which is EOLed by > > upstream since 2008. > > > > on the ports tree we have two consumer of php4, once which seems to be able t > > o > > run with php5 according to upstream website and the second which already have > > a > > newer version using php5 in the ports tree. > > > > So if you really have reason to save php4, please stand up. > > I see no reason to keep php4. > > On a tangential issue, php52 should probably be kept around, at least for > now.
The PHP maintainer disagreed on this point last week-ish. Chris > <[email protected]> > FreeBSD UNIX: <[email protected]> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org > > The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
