In message <[email protected] om> , Chris Rees writes: > --0015174c427a04100904bd4d714b > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 10 Apr 2012 04:50, "Cy Schubert" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > In message <[email protected]>, Baptiste Daroussin > writes: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Apparently we are still sheaping php4 and his friends, which is EOLed by > > > upstream since 2008. > > > > > > on the ports tree we have two consumer of php4, once which seems to be > able t > > > o > > > run with php5 according to upstream website and the second which > already have > > > a > > > newer version using php5 in the ports tree. > > > > > > So if you really have reason to save php4, please stand up. > > > > I see no reason to keep php4. > > > > On a tangential issue, php52 should probably be kept around, at least for > > now. > > The PHP maintainer disagreed on this point last week-ish.
Then ports which break should be removed as well. One of my websites broke when I upgraded PHP from 5.3 to 5.5. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <[email protected]> FreeBSD UNIX: <[email protected]> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
