On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:51:02AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 12/08/2012 10:12, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> >On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> >>I have a well working TexLive 2012 port, intended to be a replacement
> >>for teTex.
> >>
> >>...
> >>
> >>Because a lot of things depend on a working TeX install I'd like to
> >>have some volunteers in a week.
> >
> >Here we go:
> >http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/
> 
> I'm about ready now. I just need to complete the CONFLICTS. Clearly
> just anything with teTeX in the name isn't enough. I think I need
> help figuring this out.
> 
> Or at least a recommendation. Should I go ahead with a PR and just
> add ports as people report problems?

Sorry, I must have missed this part in my previous email. The CONFLICTS
you have should cover everything. I'm just speculating that the
transition would have been smoother if the teTeX ports were deleted in
one go before replacing them with portmaster.

-- 
Denny Lin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to