On 20/08/2012 10:16, Denny Lin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:51:02AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 12/08/2012 10:12, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
I have a well working TexLive 2012 port, intended to be a replacement
for teTex.
...
Because a lot of things depend on a working TeX install I'd like to
have some volunteers in a week.
Here we go:
http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/
I'm about ready now. I just need to complete the CONFLICTS. Clearly
just anything with teTeX in the name isn't enough. I think I need
help figuring this out.
Or at least a recommendation. Should I go ahead with a PR and just
add ports as people report problems?
Sorry, I must have missed this part in my previous email. The CONFLICTS
you have should cover everything. I'm just speculating that the
transition would have been smoother if the teTeX ports were deleted in
one go before replacing them with portmaster.
Maybe I need to add texlive conflicts to teTeX and its ilk.
I also want to add a texlive-asymptote port. But only after texlive
is out there. I already tested the build, but there are some dependencies
I want to add OPTIONS for and that's nothing I want to inflict on the
texlive-base.
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
