Hello.
Altough closed in 2008, I'm still it by this bug.
# uname -a
FreeBSD xxxxxx.xxxxx 9.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p2 #1 r249400: Mon Apr
22 13:00:32 CEST 2013 root@xxxxxx.xxxxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/XXXXXX i386
# ldd /usr/bin/ssh
/usr/bin/ssh:
libssh.so.5 => /usr/lib/libssh.so.5 (0x33c8c000)
libutil.so.9 => /lib/libutil.so.9 (0x33cd7000)
libz.so.6 => /lib/libz.so.6 (0x33cea000)
libgssapi.so.10 => /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.10 (0x33cfe000)
libcrypt.so.5 => /lib/libcrypt.so.5 (0x33d07000)
libcrypto.so.6 => /lib/libcrypto.so.6 (0x33d2c000)
libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x33e88000)
libkrb5.so.10 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.10 (0x33fb2000)
libhx509.so.10 => /usr/lib/libhx509.so.10 (0x34010000)
libasn1.so.10 => /usr/lib/libasn1.so.10 (0x34046000)
libcom_err.so.5 => /usr/lib/libcom_err.so.5 (0x340bb000)
libmd.so.5 => /lib/libmd.so.5 (0x340bd000)
libroken.so.10 => /usr/lib/libroken.so.10 (0x340d5000)
# ldd /usr/local/lib/nss_ldap.so.1
/usr/local/lib/nss_ldap.so.1:
libldap-2.3.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libldap-2.3.so.2 (0x33dc7000)
liblber-2.3.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/liblber-2.3.so.2 (0x33df9000)
libsasl2.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.3 (0x33e05000)
libkrb5.so.10 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.10 (0x33e1e000)
libcom_err.so.5 => /usr/lib/libcom_err.so.5 (0x33e7c000)
libgssapi_krb5.so.10 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.10 (0x33e7e000)
libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x33c6c000)
libssl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x33e95000)
libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x34400000)
libasn1.so.10 => /usr/lib/libasn1.so.10 (0x33eee000)
libcrypt.so.5 => /lib/libcrypt.so.5 (0x33f63000)
libcrypto.so.6 => /lib/libcrypto.so.6 (0x3457c000)
libhx509.so.10 => /usr/lib/libhx509.so.10 (0x33f88000)
libroken.so.10 => /usr/lib/libroken.so.10 (0x33fbe000)
libgssapi.so.10 => /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.10 (0x33fce000)
libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x33fd7000)
Removing the openssl port is not a viable option for me, since:
# pkg_info -R openssl\* | wc
200 199 3671
I had a look at /usr/ports/net/openldap23-server/Makefile and only found:
USE_OPENSSL= yes
AFAICT this does not give any preference wrt to base vs port openssl; if
I'm correct this means the port is choosen if installed, but, otherwise,
openssl from base is used.
Wouldn't it be better to use base only? Put a knot to give the user a
choice?
Would I screw too many things if I tried adding:
WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes
bye & Thanks
av.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
