|Obviously, the ports are not in sync with the current Stable and
|Experimental branches of Postfix.
Olli Hauer wrote:
No they are not and I plan the following to let users some time
for the transition to 3.1.
- mail/postfix (2.11.7) -> mail/postfix211
- mail/postfix-current (3.0.4) -> mail/postfix
- postfix-current will be updated to 3.1.0 (released this week)
In some weeks 3.1.x will become the default postfix, and 3.0.x
will be removed from the tree, postfix211 will stay as the last
postfix 2.x releases and current will become again current.
There are some users using VDA patches, only available for
postfix 2.8 but it also works on 2.11, there is no support from
the VDA project for 3.x and it seems the VDA project is no longer
alive.
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:29:43 -0800 (PST), Roger Marquis stated:
3.2 is an experimental release.
It would be misleading to label it current.
On 2016-02-26 20:32, Carmel wrote:
The experimental version of Postfix has been labeled "postfix-current"
for as long as I can remember. To change it now would really confuse
some users.
This was indeed the case (postfix-current == "The experimental"
(development) version) a few years back. It was kept closely
up-to-date with the latest development release. I lived under
impression that it still is supposed to be so (but just happen
to be lagging a bit) - but apparently this is no longer so.
I wish the postfix-current would track the latest development release
as it used to do. It made it possible for FreeBSD users to more
fruitfully contribute back to the project by quickly responding
to new features and potential problems.
If this is deemed unsuitable, then there should be a new port
mail/postfix-devel to track the latest releases (although then
I don't know to what purpose a postfix-current would serve).
Mark
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
