On 2016-10-12 10:27, Julian Elischer wrote:
what I really need is a RUNTIME option that produces a package with
only those files needed to satisfy external run-time depdencies, or
the actual demands of the user itself. However since those files are

Right. But then the question is how do you define what is minimum required code to satisfy external run time deps? Can the framework assume it by path, or should the maintainers define it through options?

IMHO if the latter, then my suggestion is not to define any roles ("runtime") but define groups of files that can then be included in whatever role. Eg, all include/... files be switched with HEADERS option. Many ports already do DOCS, MANPAGES, EXAMPLES. So that's a set criteria one can base -runtime variant upon:



Vlad K.
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to