> > I personally can't see the rationale of many OS version branches of ports:
> > far too much work.
> > I had the thought of something like that for (NetBSD) pkgsrc: a very tall
> > order, considering that pkgsrc has been ported to many OSes besides NetBSD.
> > Imagine a separate branch of pkgsrc for every version and branch of NetBSD,
> > FreeBSD, Linux, etc.
> > I only follow the current branch of FreeBSD ports and pkgsrc, though now I
> > have also become interested in pkgsrc-synth.
> Tom
> Are there any advantages of using pkg instead of pkgsrc on FreeBSD?
> Instead of having branches by OS version, would having ports LTS branches
> independent of the base system be a better solution?
> Grzegorz
It looks like you might have misunderstood something I said about pkgsrc.
I use pkg with FreeBSD ports on FreeBSD, but my interest in pkgsrc and
pkgsrc-synth is for NetBSD.
Working with pkgsrc on NetBSD convinces me that they need to import portupgrade
and/or portmaster from FreeBSD, maybe synth will be better?
Pkgsrc is awkward dealing with packages whose names have changes or branched.
Ports LTS branches, is that Long Term Service? I don't really understand that
question.
Tom
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
