Chris writes: > No - NOT the PC - the hardware that's in question. The Adaptec WITH the > modified code. I'm willing to bet, it's not.
Should I check for restrictions on chipset temperature, relative humidity, and atmospheric pressure as well? > Again - I doubt that that perticulare Adaptec WITH the modifide code is > listed. Now I'll bet an untouched Adaptec is. Nothing on the list says either way. > The PC is NOT the issue. The modified Adaptec IS. FreeBSD is the target, not the controller. > No - not worthless - NOT SUPPORTED. Just like the HCL that MS puts out. There are lots of configurations unsupported by Microsoft that will still run Windows without problems. > Another thing to understand, most of the HP added code is related to > SNMP. That's what HP/Compaq does. Now, you also need to realize that the > drivers under NT talk to HAL (Hardware Abstration Layer) which happenes > to be far more forgiving of altered code then something under Unix where > the driver talks directly to the hardware. Are you saying that Windows NT has a superior design? -- Anthony _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
