On Nov 17, 2005, at 5:00 AM, J.D. Bronson wrote:
At 03:52 AM 11/17/2005, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Hmmm,
We run a lot of Solaris 8 and FreeBSD. I find Solaris 8 pretty
much the same speed as FreeBSD for what we do. However, one thing
is that we do not run X-windows on either our Solaris 8 or FreeBSD
systems, because they are servers and there is no need for it.
I've generally not found trouble obtaining the patches for Solaris
I've needed, most of them are in the cluster patch, and the ones that
aren't yet are critical (such as the repaired ncsd program) are
available on the Internet on non-Sun-approved websites.
Indeed. But this is not Solaris 10 - thats when all of this changed.
This is an interesting thread as we just had a big "discussion" about
"free" Solaris 10 and patches on a Solaris x86 list (at yahoo)...
But I run Solaris 10 on a machine (and could be more in the future).
Strictly server -- no Xwindows etc, and I also have FreeBSD 5.4 on
several machines. The speed of various things is comparable, about
the same, on similar HW and FreeBSD 5.4 and Solaris 10 and Solaris
has higher performing java (naturally) as well as better resource
management and better "jails" (zones) (including multicast dns
working inside of the zone which does not work in FreeBSD jail) so
for what I needed it seems to be a better choice. Except for the
"patches." Sun is screwing the pooch with this one...
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
