On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:16:23PM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote: > On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:37:54PM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote: > >>On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> > >>>On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 01:34:14PM -0500, daniel wrote: > >>>>FreeBSD will occasionally release security advisories detailing the > >>>>badness > >>>>surrounding a single package and will often include the following as the > >>>>solution: > >>>> > >>>> 1) Upgrade your vulnerable system to 4-STABLE, 5-STABLE, or 6-STABLE, > >>>> or to the RELENG_6_0, RELENG_5_4, RELENG_5_3, RELENG_4_11, or > >>>> RELENG_4_10 security branch dated after the correction date. > >>>> > >>>>What does this mean? And how do I do it? > >>> > >>>Both questions are answered in the handbook. > >> > >>They are, but why is 6-STABLE even mentioned since RELENG_6 is the cvs > >>tag? Or are there a 6-STABLE tag as well? > > > >They are different names for the same thing. > > Let me rephrase it. Is it not uneccesary to mention 6-STABLE, since > RELENG_6 is the same thing, and the only string you'll ever use when > doing the upgrade the advisory advice is in fact "RELENG_6"?
You'll encounter 6-STABLE often when people talk about it, so you need to know what it means. > It seems redundant, as they are as you say just different names for the > same thing, but RELENG_6 is the only one actually used when cvsup'ing? Yes. Kris
pgpLJiTCxO6NZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature