On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:26:33 +0200, "Jonathan McKeown"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Monday 11 September 2006 15:56, Jud wrote:
> > everyone who uses FreeBSD knows that a "better" (meaning,
> > at least to many folks, more simplified and graphical)
> > installer would be nice
> Perhaps as an option. The problem is that you need to install a graphical
> environment to run a graphical installer. Simplicity means different
> to different people, too.
> Now the only time my servers get a screen/keyboard connected is to
> the BIOS when they are first unpacked. Otherwise the basic install is
> from the serial boot CD with my laptop as a serial terminal, up to the
> where I can ssh to the box and start customising, adding packages etc.
> my point of view it doesn't get simpler than that.
Yes, I meant "at least to many folks" literally - there are many people
for whom a graphical installer would be overcomplication. I personally
like the "The BSD Installer" <URL: http://www.bsdinstaller.org/>; it
just happens to suit the way I install a system in that it makes
available most of what I tweak and I don't use most of what it hides. I
wish the Summer of Code project to adapt it for FreeBSD installation
(<URL: http://wikitest.freebsd.org/BSDInstaller> were more alive than it
appears to be.
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day." -
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"