I wouldve bet the minimal install would fit in 200 megs..
Bri
----- Original Message -----
From: "Petr Slansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 8:28 AM
Subject: FreeBSD 4.7 cannot fit to 200MB disk!!
> Hello!
>
> I tried to install FreBSD 4.7 on i486@133 with 16MB of Ram and 200MB disk.
W95
> worked nice on that machine. I failed to install a minimal configuration
of
> FreeBSD on such hardware!! Is it ok? I wanted only basic console...
>
> I noticed that many source files (*.h) were instaled to my disk. Is it
ok??
> >From my point of view, instalation could be more scalable, minimal could
be
> more minimal.
>
> This is not a big problem for me, I will run W95 on my old pc as I did. I
was
> only suprised how big modern FreeBSD is. Is it necessary? I like new
programs,
> more options, but I would like to have an option to add them only when I
need
> them.
>
> Thanks for FreeBSD!
> Petr
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Petr Slansky, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---------------------------------
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
