There are two sets of commands you can use to build a kernel in FreeBSD:
"Procedure 1" is the old way: config, make depend, make, make install.
"Procedure 2" is the make kernel sequence from makeworld.
Section 9.3 of the Handbook says I should use procedure 1 if I haven't
updated my source tree. I can understand then need to use procedure 2
if I've updated my source tree, but why shouldn't I use it with an
unmodified tree?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
- Re: Why should I use `config;make depend;make...` instea... Darren Pilgrim
- Re: Why should I use `config;make depend;make...` i... Lowell Gilbert
- Re: Why should I use `config;make depend;make..... Darren Pilgrim
- Re: Why should I use `config;make depend;ma... Scott Mitchell
- Re: Why should I use `config;make depen... Giorgos Keramidas
- Re: Why should I use `config;make ... Scott Mitchell
- Re: Why should I use `config;make depend;make...` i... Mike Meyer