On 11/14/07, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:57:26 pm Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Jonathan Horne wrote: > > > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:39:47 pm Jonathan Horne wrote: > > >> my jails server (6.2-p8) just ran portupgrade fine, and cups was one of > > >> its items it updated: > > >> > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pkg_info | grep cups- > > >> cups-base-1.3.3_2 Common UNIX Printing System > > >> > > >> but my 7.0-b2 desktop, refuses to build the same package: > > >> > > >> ===> cups-base-1.3.3_2 has known vulnerabilities: > > >> => cups -- off-by-one buffer overflow. > > >> Reference: > > >> <http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/8dd9722c-8e97-11dc-b8f6-001c2514 > > >>716 c.html> => Please update your ports tree and try again. > > >> *** Error code 1 > > >> > > >> what would be the differences between the 2 systems that one would build > > >> it, and the other reject the same port? ive not tweaked any port > > >> security settings on either one, so this is some curious behavior to me. > > >> > > >> thanks, > > > > > > another interesting thing, when you read the portaudit page for this, it > > > says: > > > > > > Affects: > > > cups-base <1.3.3_1 > > > > > > but yet 1.3.3_2 still is rejected. > > > > One or the other has either a stale portaudit database or ports tree. > > > > Kris > > what is the method for updating the portaudit database? both have had their > ports trees updated today, the 7.0 box multiple times. > > thanks, > -- > Jonathan Horne > http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I ran into a similar issue with cups - what does 'portaudit -aF' give on each machine? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"