but then i'm going say route _ALL_ traffic for that, and i need to be able to get in through both interfaces, as if one ISP is down, i can access in through another... thats the whole point of this thing
On Nov 16, 2007 4:04 PM, Steve Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > alexus wrote: > > i dont see any difference as at the end i still get this > > > > 216.112.241.24/29 216.112.241.25 UGS 0 0 fxp1 > > > > in my netstat -rn, and no its still doesn't work... > > This is not the point. > > You need a route via the gateway that 216 is connected to for the REMOTE > IP/network. Say for instance your 'home' connection is: > > 64.39.177.22, then you need a route like this: > > route add 64.39.177.22/32 $isp_gateway > > What you have: > > 216.112.241.24/29 216.112.241.25 UGS 0 0 fxp1 > > ...says '206.112.241.24/29 should be routed to 216.112.241.25. That is > ALL it will route via that path. > > Steve > -- http://alexus.org/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"