but then i'm going say route _ALL_ traffic for that, and i need to be able to get in through both interfaces, as if one ISP is down, i can access in through another... thats the whole point of this thing
On Nov 16, 2007 4:04 PM, Steve Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > alexus wrote: > > i dont see any difference as at the end i still get this > > > > 22.214.171.124/29 126.96.36.199 UGS 0 0 fxp1 > > > > in my netstat -rn, and no its still doesn't work... > > This is not the point. > > You need a route via the gateway that 216 is connected to for the REMOTE > IP/network. Say for instance your 'home' connection is: > > 188.8.131.52, then you need a route like this: > > route add 184.108.40.206/32 $isp_gateway > > What you have: > > 220.127.116.11/29 18.104.22.168 UGS 0 0 fxp1 > > ...says '22.214.171.124/29 should be routed to 126.96.36.199. That is > ALL it will route via that path. > > Steve > -- http://alexus.org/ _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"