On Fri, 30 May 2008 11:39:03 -0400, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Zimmerman wrote: >> heres some interesting reading about qmail... >> http://www.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qmail-bugs.html > > That so much time and effort is spent telling everyone how bad qmail > is still amazes me. It is one of the best performing and most > extensible MTAs I have ever used. It is not however, suitable for > those who choose not to understand how mail works. Point and clickers > should stay with Postfix, also a very capable MTA.
This freebsd-questions thread is approaching a low signal/noise ratio very very fast. MTAs are a hotly debated subject, and they tend to spark the flames of a religious war *very* fast. Can we _please_ try to steer this discussion back on track, and actually _help_ the original poster, instead of showing that in a dick size war we can definitely 'win' by our elite administrator skillz? Please? _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"