On the same portable there is also a SUSE Linux 10.1 and WinXP, which works
in 1280x768 (so the hardware can use this resolution)
In /var/log/Xorg.0.log is see many references to 1280x768 for the 'local
flat panel' , PanelID returned panel resolution: 1280x768, also
Printing DDC gathered Modelines:
(||) 1810(0): Modeline "1280x768"x0.0 (followed by varying numbers and
a KhZ to end)
Mode: 30 (640x480)
diffenrent Mode sections but 1024x768 at the highest
(||) |810(0): Not using mode "1280x768i (no mode of that name)
(--) |810(0): Virtual size is 1024x768 (pitch 1024)
(**) |810(0): Built-in mode "1024x768"
(**) |810(0): Display dimensions: (260,160) mm
(**) |810(0): DPI set to (100,121)
Why isnt' the 1289x768 recognized???
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Mel wrote:
On Tuesday 11 November 2008 11:16:14 Pieter Donche wrote:
Hmm, playing arround in KDE with -xrandr
$ xrandr --size 1280x768
Size 1280x768 not found in available modes
(?? it's in my /etc/X11/xorg.conf ??)
Just because you put a modeline in the xorg config, does not mean the
videodriver, monitor or card itself, supports that mode.
Inspect /var/log/Xorg.0.log, specifically the supported modes detection,lines
(--) NVIDIA(0): Interlaced video modes are supported on this GPU
(--) NVIDIA(0): Connected display device(s) on GeForce Go 7600 at PCI:1:0:0:
(--) NVIDIA(0): Seiko (DFP-0)
(--) NVIDIA(0): Seiko (DFP-0): 330.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
(--) NVIDIA(0): Seiko (DFP-0): Internal Dual Link LVDS
(II) NVIDIA(0): Assigned Display Device: DFP-0
(II) NVIDIA(0): Validated modes:
(II) NVIDIA(0): "1440x900"
(II) NVIDIA(0): "1024x768"
(II) NVIDIA(0): "800x600"
(II) NVIDIA(0): "640x480"
It's also helpful to know the make and model of your graphics card, and which
driver you're using for it.
Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"