On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:49:43 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar <woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
>> >> I think that can be handled quite easily by community social >> pressure, and moderation would just set a precedent for "it's >> someone else's job". > >moderation is needed. Things like "community social pressure" >simply doesn't. Like with democracy - those who are more common and >louder will takeover, no matter if it make sense or not. Yes, and you have gone a long way in proving just that point. Your narrow minded, inability to accept anyone else's opinions that are even slightly ajar of your own preconceived concepts are a perfect example of your inability to work and play well with others. Actually, I like your reference to 'Democracy'. Coming from a socialist, the very thought of an open discussion on any matter that does not fit in your narrow parameters would seem objectionable. >It's already happening on that group that's why i talk about starting >moderation to remove all posts that are not about group topic! Might I suggest that we start with yours. I am all ready creating a KILL filter to rid my INBOX of your useless diatribe. Furthermore, I believe that your are the reason that vendors are not more interested in FreeBSD. How could any of them expect to reasonably work with a narrow minded, opinionated, buffoon like you? You concept of cooperation is: "My way, or no way." -- Jerry ges...@yahoo.com Speaking of purchasing a dog, never buy a watchdog that's on sale. After all, everyone knows a bargain dog never bites!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
