On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 09:55:39AM -0800, new_guy wrote: > > > RW-15 wrote: > > > > On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:16:50 +0000 > > Frank Shute <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> pdksh is statically linked and I don't know if bash is. > > > > It's a build option. > > > > > > Seems root should have a static shell always... otherwise, all bets are off > as some of the shared libs may be inaccessible or damaged. So long as bash > is statically linked and properly located, there should not be an issue. But > most folks (linux users) aren't aware of the implications of dynamic linking > and such. So it's probably best to 'just say no' to the OP's question. Leave > root's shell alone unless you know what you're doing and bash is built > appropriately.
Well put. ////jerry > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Root-shell-tp22274005p22293187.html > Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
