Hi, On 26 June 2009 am 10:02:30 Polytropon wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:55:48 +0800, Erich Dollansky <er...@apsara.com.sg> wrote: > > this is not what I mean. I wanted to say, as long as the boot > > disk come up, I also have /usr available when I have the > > space to have it all on the same disk. > > I see. The fact that /usr isn't available after booting in > maintenance mode (SUM) is often important for recovery > purposes. The OS leaves it to the admin to take such important > decisions. :-) > yes, but then he or she knows why certain things on certain places unlike those day when it has had to be on those places.
> > Yes, this is the idea of the ideas. > > > > But why don't we take Microsoft Word running under wine? > > > > I mean, if we strike, we should have a real strike. > > That's a very good suggestion. But let's take into mind that we > do need the most advanced and modern MICROS~1 technology, so > FreeBSD should include a pirated copy of "Windows 7" in order > to run the latest and most expensive pirated copy of "Office", > programmed in Java, running through "Flash". With music. And > dancing puppies. > > If - then real. :-) Yes, this is the best suggestion up to date. > Polytropon > From Magdeburg, Germany Solltest Du jetzt nicht schlafen? Hier scheint wenigstens die Sonne. Erich _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"