On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:33:56 +0800, Erich Dollansky <er...@apsara.com.sg> wrote: > > On 26 June 2009 am 10:02:30 Polytropon wrote: > > Polytropon > > From Magdeburg, Germany > > big brother is watching me.
Yes, Dr. Schäuble does so. :-) > An xterm just came up with this message: > > "The default editor in FreeBSD is vi, which is efficient to use > when you have learned it, but somewhat user-unfriendly. To use > ee (an easier but less powerful editor) instead, set the > environment variable EDITOR to /usr/bin/ee" > > Isn't this the best reasoning why it should stay as it is? The ee editor isn't that bad. Especially ^K and ^L are more easy to use than vi's edit buffer equivalent. While there's ed and ex in /rescue, ee isn't. % which ee | xargs ldd /usr/bin/ee: libncurses.so.7 => /lib/libncurses.so.7 (0x28088000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x280c6000) Relies on ncurses, but so does dialog / sysinstall... -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"