2009/10/30 Adam Vande More <amvandem...@gmail.com>

> No my point was top is not accurate measure of HAL's memory usage.  HAL has
> shared library's just like many other applications.

Yep, I know all about that. But it is indicative. And indeed born out by the
fact that when HAL is not running I get 18MB more memory free.

This is only because of your misinterpretation of data and failure to RTFM.

Not entirely true. I didn't misinterpret the data - it was accurate. I
didn't read the FM, but then again if HAL worked as it is meant to, I
shouldn't need to. Isn't that the whole point of HAL? Starting X and finding
no keyboard or mouse working is hardly what I would call success.

> Adam Vande More

freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to