Polytropon writes:
> > I am now thinking which one is better.
>
> I have used portupgrade / portinstall in the past, but I think
> portmaster really is the way to go, at least for me,
As far as I can tell, for 90-95% of tasks they're
indistinguishable. If (generic) you have special needs - ugdating a
large user base, extensive local patches, or a non-standard set of
dependencies - then you're going to have to do the research and test
them for yourself.
And instructions for using portmaster are increasingly common
in /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Robert Huff
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
