Quoth Randal L. Schwartz on Tuesday, 14 September 2010: > >>>>> "Jules" == Jules Gilbert <jules.sto...@gmail.com> writes: > > Jules> Now, if Oracle won't adjust their thinking, I intend to look at Java > Jules> sub-systems that are supplied and built by other people than Oracle. > Jules> (It's called Open Source.) > > And that's what I tried to say in my last few posts. Given Oracle's > apparent stance to own Java not by copyright but by patent, it doesn't > *matter* that Java is "open source". We'll have to wait until Oracle > v. Google is decided, but unless Google can invalidate Oracle's > *patents* on Java, Java is effectively dead, unless you want to sleep in > Oracle's bed. >
... and Oracle makes for a large bedfellow, with a reputation for a painful embrace. -- Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterl...@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips.com
pgp7BWh3Gq9yy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
