On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:18:03 -0600, Gary Gatten <ggat...@waddell.com> wrote: > Everyone is wrong! "pfmsh" is the best at everything, period. > It does everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow. > It doesn't require any upgrades, ever. It's 100% secure. > It doesn't use any memory or other resources, $hit, it doesn't > even need to be installed; it just "magically" works. > > There you have it.
The standard reply to "is better" or "is the best" is "I don't like" followed by any arbitrary attribute, like "but I don't like the color" or "I don't like the file names". :-) Meanwhile, I've looked into mksh and found out that giving it a standard prompt (user@host:path$) is not very easy and involves copying two lines from the manpage (search for PS1) into a config file. It's not that you can use bash's prompt 1:1 (or csh's). Completition and history behaviour is nice, better than bash, in my opinion, and equal to csh (which I prefer in this regards). Oh "prefer" - it's all very individual, that's why the system's default shell should be replaced by punched cards. Everyone likes colorful punched cards. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
