On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Rob Farmer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Andres Perera <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Chip Camden >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> -- >>> Sterling (Chip) Camden | [email protected] | 2048D/3A978E4F >>> http://chipsquips.com | http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com >>> >> >> btw, would you stop putting ads on your signature? it's annoying >> > > LOL - how hypocritical. This thread was four days dead then suddenly > two people show up and start pushing this mksh shell, which seems to > be part of some obscure OpenBSD fork. If anyone is "advertising" it's > you.
actually, *any* modern ksh variant, including both oksh and mksh would be better than tcsh as default shell. both would be a huge improvement over the rotting pile of poop that is tcsh and if you're going to qualify, you better know wtf you're talking about, because mksh is used by android and red hat the only major os, excluding variants, with tcsh on the base system is freebsd nevermind that the tcsh comparison was done way before anyone explained mksh... noob > > -- > Rob Farmer > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
