El 30-10-2011, a las 19:55, Warren Block <wbl...@wonkity.com> escribió:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote: > >> What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost no >> one serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I tried also install >> KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have been many errors, commonly solocionables, >> for example I had to modify "REFRESH" to "true", but also to get out other >> errors, commonly have a solution, but is a great problem to have to spend >> all his time fixing bugs. Please tell me if it is natural to every time I >> download large modifying ports so, if so, then why say "functional"? > > Yes, ports work well. From the description, it's difficult to tell what is > causing the problem. Please supply additional information, like what version > of FreeBSD and the exact output of one of the errors (script(1) is useful for > that). Also see the section in the Handbook about packages and ports: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports.html > > Translations of the Handbook can be found at > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/doc/ in the books subdirectory. the problem is not the problem, since most are solving the problem is that there are many errors and problems, then as I say it is stable and functional?_______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
