On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:31:31PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > While updating my port (math/slatec) to use > the new OPTIONS framework, I did some > experiments with the profiling library. > > I don't know much about this, so what surprised me > is that the profiling library is smaller: > > # ls -al lib*a > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6582354 Jul 12 22:56 libslatec.a > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6555122 Jul 12 23:02 libslatec_p.a > # > > while it adds .mcount symbol to each object file: > > # nm libslatec.a > nm > # nm libslatec_p.a > nmp > # wc nm nmp > 16436 36675 373033 nm > 17885 39573 413605 nmp > 34321 76248 786638 total > # grep -c mcount nmp > 1449 > # expr 16436 + 1449 > 17885 > # > > Using diff I can confirm that the only difference > between the 2 libs is the .mcount symbol for > each object file in the profiling library. > > So how can the profiling library be smaller? >
Also, the library compiled on amd64 has lots more symbols than if compiled on ia64. For example: amd64: zbesy.o: 0000000000000000 r .LC0 0000000000000008 r .LC1 0000000000000010 r .LC11 0000000000000020 r .LC12 0000000000000028 r .LC13 0000000000000030 r .LC14 0000000000000010 r .LC2 0000000000000018 r .LC5 0000000000000000 r .LC6 U cos U d1mach_ U exp U i1mach_ U sin U zbesh_ 0000000000000000 T zbesy_ and ia64: zbesy.o: U cos U d1mach_ U exp U i1mach_ U sin U zbesh_ 0000000000000000 T zbesy_ Why the difference? -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"