> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:52:18 +0100 > From: Anton Shterenlikht <me...@bristol.ac.uk> > Subject: Re: profiling library smaller than non-profiling, > while it contains more symbols. Why? > > Also, the library compiled on amd64 has lots more > symbols than if compiled on ia64.
This is _not_ unexpected with different processor architectures, and thus different instruction sets. Speculation: the values lfor the .LC* variables look like bit-masks -- it may be that ia64 has opcodes that allow immediate operannds, obviating the need for a 'data' consntat in memory. "Something" in the source causes different processor-specific code to be generated -- one processor uses 'data' constants, the other doesn't. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"