On 10/28/2012 2:16 AM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On 10/28/2012 03:00 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> PKGNG is a replacement for the pkg_* tools that record package data in >> /var/db/pkg. >> >> It also allows for binary package upgrades. >> >> If you are wanting to use pkgng for binary packages, there's no need to >> use portupgrade anymore. Just 'pkg install name', 'pkg upgrade', etc. >> > Understood. Thanks. > > For some reason I thought I could use the PKGNG tool set together with > portupgrade the same way the pkg_* tools are used.
pkgng obsoletes portupgrade -P and pkg_add -r. Even if portupgrade -P did have pkg support, it would not work right because of different OPTIONS/dependencies, and the desync between your local ports tree and the remote package server's versions. You can use 'pkg install' to replace 'portupgrade -P' right now, and just not use -P if you want to use the port. But it will not go smoothly. Picking one of the other is best. (Ports or packages) If you're managing multiple servers with packages, I recommend checking out ports-mgmt/poudriere (http://fossil.etoilebsd.net/poudriere) as it will build the binary packages to create your own remote pkgng repository. poudriere+pkgng really do obsolete portupgrade all together. > > Is there a straightforward way to go back to using the pkg_* tools in 9.1? If you have not installed, upgraded, or deinstalled anything, yes. You can cp all of the package dirs from /var/db/pkg.bak into /var/db/pkg, and remove WITH_PKGNG from /etc/make.conf and then run pkgdb -fu again. > > Thanks. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery bdrewery@freenode/EFNet _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
