On 11/26/2012 11:37 AM, jb wrote:
jb <jb.1234abcd <at> gmail.com> writes:

>...
> > ># portsnap fetch extract
> > ># ls -al /usr/ports/IN*
> > >-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  26879597 Nov 26 15:37 /usr/ports/INDEX-7
> > >-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  26763600 Nov 26 15:38 /usr/ports/INDEX-8
> > >-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  26744834 Nov 26 15:38 /usr/ports/INDEX-9
> > >-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   1654048 Nov 11 11:45 /usr/ports/INDEX-9.bz2
One detail.
The size of /usr/ports/INDEX-9 is 26744834.

        

<SNIP>

One wonders if using svn to keep the ports tree up-to-date might not be
simpler, and perhaps, more reliable ...



--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to